Primary Applying involving HigherOrder RNA Relationships through SHAPEJuMP

From Informatic
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Furthermore, feedback communication between the CTD and histone modifications coordinates chromatin states with RNA polymerase II-mediated transcription, ensuring the effective and accurate conversion of information into cellular responses.Structural studies of membrane proteins, especially small membrane proteins, are associated with well-known experimental challenges. Complexation with monoclonal antibody fragments is a common strategy to augment such proteins; however, generating antibody fragments that specifically bind a target protein is not trivial. Here we identify a helical epitope, from the membrane-proximal external region (MPER) of the gp41-transmembrane subunit of the HIV envelope protein, that is recognized by several well-characterized antibodies and that can be fused as a contiguous extension of the N-terminal transmembrane helix of a broad range of membrane proteins. To analyze whether this MPER-epitope tag might aid structural studies of small membrane proteins, we determined an X-ray crystal structure of a membrane protein target that does not crystallize without the aid of crystallization chaperones, the Fluc fluoride channel, fused to the MPER epitope and in complex with antibody. We also demonstrate the utility of this approach for single particle electron microscopy with Fluc and two additional small membrane proteins that represent different membrane protein folds, AdiC and GlpF. These studies show that the MPER epitope provides a structurally defined, rigid docking site for antibody fragments that is transferable among diverse membrane proteins and can be engineered without prior structural information. Antibodies that bind to the MPER epitope serve as effective crystallization chaperones and electron microscopy fiducial markers, enabling structural studies of challenging small membrane proteins.
Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (DNETs) are known to have low metastatic potential and follow an indolent course. Although DNETs<1 cm in size are amenable to endoscopic resection, little is known about the long-term outcomes and recurrence rates of this approach.
Sixty-three patients with DNETs from 3 centers were retrospectively studied from 2003 to 2018. We analyzed their resection modality (EMR, snare polypectomy, or forceps polypectomy), margin status, risk factors for recurrence, recurrence rate, and endoscopic surveillance patterns.
Of the 63 patients who underwent endoscopic resection, 13 (20.6%) had recurrence. The presence of R1 margins was found to be a statistically significant risk factor for recurrence (P= .048). Mean surveillance time for all DNETs was 2.8 ± 2.6 years. Ninety-two percent of recurrences were detected within 3 years of resection.
Our data suggest that the main predictor of recurrence in low-grade DNETs<1.0 cm is the presence of positive tumor margins at the initial endoscopic resection. More frequent, earlier surveillance after resection than that currently recommended by European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society guidelines may be warranted to promptly capture DNET recurrences. Additionally, no recurrences occurred in our cohort after 4 years of surveillance.
Our data suggest that the main predictor of recurrence in low-grade DNETs less then 1.0 cm is the presence of positive tumor margins at the initial endoscopic resection. More frequent, earlier surveillance after resection than that currently recommended by European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society guidelines may be warranted to promptly capture DNET recurrences. Additionally, no recurrences occurred in our cohort after 4 years of surveillance.Graves' orbitopathy (GO) is the primary cause of exophthalmos in adults. It appears in 30 to 50% of patients with Graves' disease. About 5% are moderate-to-severe cases that might be see-threatening or lead to long term disabling sequelae. Recommendations have been established in 2016 by the European thyroid association (ETA) and the European group on Grave's orbitopathy (EUGOGO), suggesting a wide use of corticosteroids in moderate to severe forms. However, disappointing results have been reported in 20 to 30% of cases. Improved understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms has allowed the use of non-specific immunomodulatory agents, currently under evaluation, and which place in the therapeutic strategy remains to be determined. Very recently, new promising therapeutic advances have emerged with the identification of new therapeutic targets, such as the TSH receptor and IGF-1 receptor complex.As a class of drugs prescribed to heart disease patients, statins are among the most popular prescription drugs in the world. Over the years, statins have been shown to have beneficial effects on patients via pathways independent of their effect on cholesterol. These pleiotropic effects vary across the different statins, and a growing hypothesis is that they are related to the localization of the statins in and their effect on the membrane. In this study, we use molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with the CHARMM36 all-atom force field to investigate the localization of statins (atorvastatin, cerivastatin, lovastatin, and pravastatin) in a POPC bilayer and how they affect the acyl chain order parameters (SCD), surface area per lipid (APL), and thicknesses of the bilayer. The data obtained from 500 ns simulations suggests that lovastatin is localized deepest in the membrane, mostly interacting with the hydrophobic core, cerivastatin is slightly closer to the bilayer/solvent interface than lovastatin and interacts with the headgroups via its dihydroxy acid group, and pravastatin is found closest to the bilayer/solvent interface, its hydrophobic rings interacting mostly with the region around the acyl's carbonyl and its dihydroxy acid interacting with the solvent and the headgroups. Consistent binding of atorvastatin to the bilayer is not observed during our simulation due to self-aggregation. find more The statins differentially alter the SCD and APL and most of the bilayer thicknesses, but these effects are modest. Overall, as expected, the localization of statins seems to follow their hydrophilicity, and given previous data showing the relationship between statins' hydrophobicity and pleiotropic effects, one would expect statins that localize and interact with different regions of the membrane to have different effects. This research provides some important insight into statin localization in a simplified model of a cellular membrane.